<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Public sector productivity &#8211; a tricky concept</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/2009/06/public-sector-productivity-a-tricky-concept/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/2009/06/public-sector-productivity-a-tricky-concept/</link>
	<description>Policy news and comment from the Trades Union Congress (TUC)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:18:46 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Public and private-sector productivity &#171; Bloggers4Labour</title>
		<link>http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/2009/06/public-sector-productivity-a-tricky-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-2593</link>
		<dc:creator>Public and private-sector productivity &#171; Bloggers4Labour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 21:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/?p=2926#comment-2593</guid>
		<description>[...] is in response to &#8211; or rather, following on from &#8211; this from Nigel Stanley at the TUC&#8217;s Touchstone blog, itself a response to the highly partisan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is in response to &#8211; or rather, following on from &#8211; this from Nigel Stanley at the TUC&#8217;s Touchstone blog, itself a response to the highly partisan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Marks</title>
		<link>http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/2009/06/public-sector-productivity-a-tricky-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-2592</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 21:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/?p=2926#comment-2592</guid>
		<description>This always confuses me.

We want the police to be on the streets and more neighbourhood policing, but measured by typical economic indicators, this appears terribly inefficient and prompt question: how do hours spent building up contacts in the community help fight crime? We know the answer - if the police have no links with the people, it&#039;s more like a force than a service. But it&#039;s very hard to measure efficency...

On measuring inputs and outputs, it&#039;s been pointed out that outcomes must also be considered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This always confuses me.</p>
<p>We want the police to be on the streets and more neighbourhood policing, but measured by typical economic indicators, this appears terribly inefficient and prompt question: how do hours spent building up contacts in the community help fight crime? We know the answer &#8211; if the police have no links with the people, it&#8217;s more like a force than a service. But it&#8217;s very hard to measure efficency&#8230;</p>
<p>On measuring inputs and outputs, it&#8217;s been pointed out that outcomes must also be considered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
